Post by k***@mslinux.comPost by Tom ChanceWoah, why would CNN give a damn? =) Linus Torvalds is *NOT* a superstar,
he's just a well-known geek amongst the geek community.
If Linus is a not a superstar why people make a big fuss of his
comment? Slashdot commands about 1-10 million users. That goes to show
his popularity
reach. CNN did report on Linus the creator Linux being the Windows
killer. So, I think Linus does has a lot of weight in the mainstream
press.
Slashdot isn't the mainstream, it's extremely geeky. And no Linus doesn't have
a lot of weight, he's not a Michael Jordan with a multi-million dollar
marketing campaign behind him. He has a little name recognition associated
with some obscure computer product. There's a big difference.
Post by k***@mslinux.comPost by Tom ChanceAnyway, the only way this can be interesting to a journalist is for it to be a
bitch fight between KDE and GNOME. Linus uses KDE... so what? I bet he
uses lots of free software, who cares? The story is "Linux lays into
GNOME", that's what got covered and KDE got some incidental coverage as a
result. Look at the total lack of interest in Linus' new tool 'Git' after
the geek press storm surrounding BitKeeper and it's obvious why one got
coverage and another didn't.
KDE has momentum. Linux has momentum. Using the momentum to push this
forward
by leveraging Linus popularity to bring KDE more to the mass. Think of
momentum like inertia, once it goes, it keeps on going. You need to work
with this inertia to make this force to grow exponentially faster.
That's a massive over-simplification =)
Post by k***@mslinux.comGit and BitKeeper are interest of developers which have an audience less
than 10,000 people (mainly developers) whereas KDE as a potential Windows
displacer has an interest of well over 1,000,000,000 people. Which do you
think make better sense in the public media? Revision control or nice
looking desktop?
You missed my point. The Git story was interesting to the media because it
represented a clash of values - between the "open source gets things done
quicker" view and the "free/open source is the right way to do it". It was a
complex story with lots of interesting angles for a certain segment of the
media.
Linus using one particular desktop environment is totally uninteresting to
non-geeky media. It will only become interesting to them when that desktop
environment, or more likely the Linux desktop, becomes interesting. We're a
long way from there...
Post by k***@mslinux.comPost by Tom ChanceIf we try to bring this up as a story we'll either just fail, or we'll further
stoke the "KDE vs GNOME" fire. For a start, no big news sites will care
about that fire. But more importantly, and what no marketing education
can teach you, that story is bad bad bad for KDE. Why? Because KDE's
immediate future depends upon GNOME also doing really well. KDE's future
depends upon people perceiving "the Linux desktop" as a killer item.
You want to intensify competition by comparing where KDE is better than
Gnome. Throwing emotional hot waters may help the ego to make things
better, but
ultimately the users who use KDE or Gnome will know which is better.
That's the ultimate goal in competition, you fight each other so you can
better each other to make the best damn desktop for the user! You don't
compete to kill each other off. That's stupid, you compete to make the
best damn desktop so you can kill your competitor (Gnome, Windows, BeOS,
etc.). See the difference?
Yes, but it's just not applicable to this context.
KDE and GNOME compete in some ways and cooperate in others. In what way do we
"fight with each other"? KDE and GNOME have a few slight differences, and
they're the subject of constant cordial discussions between contributors and
users. Nobody's saying that should stop. But it's important that things
remain cordial, and that we also focus on cooperation. A simplification
applicable to this context is that two weaker people can overcome a giant
better if they cooperate.
We do best when we both contribute towards a more important shared goal - the
Linux desktop. Competing in terms of making the better desktop environment is
good. Competing in terms of encouraging the press to cover bitch fights, and
by trying to kill each other, doesn't.
Post by k***@mslinux.comPost by Tom ChanceThere are *lots* of important tasks that need doing, and that would in
the long-term have a much bigger positive impact, than pushing this
story: http://www.spreadkde.org/dev/tasks
I disagree. KDE has exhausted their current developer's audience. And
what do
you do when you reach that pinnacle, you find more people, and how do you
find more people. You spread KDE to a bigger audience.
Did you even read that list? Your response makes me think you didn't. If you
can't be bothered to read it and consider why we're working on those tasks
then I can't be bothered to respond to your third gross simplification.
Post by k***@mslinux.comPost by Tom ChancePost by k***@mslinux.comThere are many people on this mailing list that lacks marketing
education which
I find very alarming.
Maybe you could share some of your education with us? I'm not kidding.
Your tone is very aggressive and dismissive - something I'm also guilty
of at times. Being a hacker is all about demonstrating and sharing your
skills.
I read Internet articles on superstring theory, and am writing a book
on theory of nothing.
In terms of formal education, I came from a very liberal number 1 public
university in the world. If you do your research, you can figure that out
yourself.
Excuse me? So what! I'm completing postgraduate study in philosophy (ethics
and political philosophy to be precise) at one of the top departments in the
world for my field. Through my work as an activist, journalist, editor and
KDE press worker I've gained a considerable experience of the media. I've
also studied the media quite extensively.
What does this tell you about my ability to contribute to KDE? Not a lot... as
Kurt said, in the free software world people respect you for what you *do*
not how much weight or Slashdot-esque analysis you can throw around.
I don't want this to turn into a big pointless argument. I'm suggesting that
you read through that page I linked to before, perhaps review some of the
work we've been doing in the past year, and then come back with a
well-written critique or suggestion rather than a semi-coherent rant.
Regards,
Tom
--
I'm aware that e-mails to me may be blocked by my host
because they are mistaken as spam. If this happens,
please e-mail me at: ***@yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.